Shell consultant quits, accusing agency of ‘excessive harms’ to environment | Shell

A senior safety marketing consultant has stop working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of causing “excessive harms” to the surroundings.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change dangers” and urged others within the oil and gasoline business to “stroll away whereas there’s still time”.

The executive, who works for the unbiased company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 employees. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she stated she had quit because of Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and gas agency of “operating past the design limits of our planetary methods” and “not putting environmental security before manufacturing”.

She stated: “Shell’s said safety ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Aim Zero’, they call it – and it sounds honourable however they're utterly failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and fuel extraction causes extreme harms, to our local weather, to the environment and to people. And whatever they say, Shell is simply not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett instructed the Guardian she “could not marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I couldn't carry that any longer, and I’m ready to cope with the results.”

Shell was a “major client” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries including oil and gas production. She started working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the industry.

“I can no longer work for an organization that ignores all the alarms and dismisses the risks of local weather change and ecological collapse,” she mentioned. “Because, contrary to Shell’s public expressions round net zero, they don't seem to be winding down on oil and gasoline, however planning to discover and extract way more.”

Dennett – a criminal justice graduate who has spent her profession in research and consultancy – was inspired to cease working with Shell after watching news footage of Extinction Rise up climate protesters urging the corporate’s employees to go away. The movement’s TruthTeller whistleblowing mission encourages oil and fuel employees to stroll away from the business.

The guide, who runs internal security surveys and is based in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to stroll away and “many individuals working in fossil gas companies just aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves if they actually consider their vision for extra oil and gasoline extraction secures a secure future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clear vitality sector left amid studies they had been pissed off at the tempo of Shell’s shift in direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to cut back emissions can be discussed at the assembly the place the Dutch activist group Comply with This will push for the corporate’s insurance policies to be more in step with the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has informed traders to reject the group’s resolution that asks it to set extra stringent climate targets.

The Shell investor Royal London has mentioned it intends to abstain on a vote on the firm’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief govt, Ben van Beurden, may experience an investor insurrection against his £13.5m pay packet at the AGM after the funding adviser Pirc urged a vote against it.

Sign as much as the each day Enterprise As we speak email or follow Guardian Enterprise on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson mentioned: “Be in little doubt, we're determined to deliver on our international strategy to be a net zero firm by 2050 and thousands of our people are working laborious to realize this. We have now set targets for the brief, medium and long run, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon energy, although the world will still want oil and fuel for decades to return in sectors that may’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell also faces the prospect of a potential windfall tax to fund cuts to family bills after the power industry reported bumper profits fuelled by the increase in market costs, prompting opposition events to call on the government to usher in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the most important oil and fuel producer within the North Sea spoke out towards a one-off levy, arguing it will result in the business approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Vitality’s chief executive, Linda Cook, advised the Monetary Occasions: “A better tax burden will make it more challenging for brand spanking new oil and gasoline initiatives to fulfill funding hurdle rates, that means fewer projects will likely be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when trade is being inspired to increase domestic UK oil and gas manufacturing and help an orderly power transition.”

Harbour has instructed the federal government it plans to speculate $6bn within the North Sea over three years as trade makes its case against the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Prepare dinner had acquired a £4.6m “golden hiya” from the agency.